Skip Navigation


Oxford Economic Papers Advance Access originally published online on June 3, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/3/437    most recent
gpf050v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beissinger, T.
Right arrow Articles by Egger, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow J31 - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
Right arrow J52 - Dispute Resolution: Strikes, Arbitration, and Mediation; Collective Bargaining
Right arrow J65 - Unemployment Insurance; Severance Pay; Plant Closings
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Oxford Economic Papers 56 (2004), 437-460
© Oxford University Press 2004; All rights reserved

Dynamic wage bargaining if benefits are tied to individual wages

Thomas Beissinger* and Hartmut Egger{dagger}

* Department of Economics, University of Regensburg, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany and IZA, Bonn, Germany; e-mail: thomas.beissinger{at}wiwi.uni-regensburg.de {dagger} Socioeconomic Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

In dynamic wage bargaining models it is usually assumed that individual unemployment benefits are a fraction of the average wage level. In most countries, however, unemployment benefits are instead tied to the previous level of individually earned wages. We show how the analysis has to be modified if this fact is taken into account and compare our findings for the wage-setting curve with outcomes under other unemployment compensation schemes. From this comparison it becomes evident how the shape and position of the wage-setting curve depends on the specification of the unemployment benefit system. We also demonstrate that a reduction of unemployment benefits of those who become unemployed after the bargaining period leads to higher equilibrium unemployment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.