Skip Navigation


Oxford Economic Papers Advance Access originally published online on May 27, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/3/513    most recent
gpf051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jungblut, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
Right arrow E51 - Money Supply; Credit; Money Multipliers
Right arrow E52 - Monetary Policy (Targets, Instruments, and Effects)
Right arrow G21 - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
Right arrow L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Oxford Economic Papers 56 (2004), 513-538
© Oxford University Press 2004; All rights reserved

Financial instability, oligopolistic banking, and monetary growth

Stefan Jungblut

University of Paderborn, Department of Economics, 33095 Paderborn, Germany; e-mail: jungblut{at}notes.uni-paderborn.de

This paper analyzes the dynamics of a monetary economy which is characterized by increasing returns to scale in financial intermediation. The intermediation technology is linear in deposits, but its operation requires a fixed verification cost to overcome the asymmetric information about a borrower's investment outcome. Intermediaries, termed banks, can avoid the costly duplication of information disclosure. Due to the non–convexity in intermediation activities, two stationary monetary equilibria exist. The first is a saddle with high economic activity and high competition in banking. In the second equilibrium, competition between banks and economic activity are low. Under adverse economic conditions, the low activity equilibrium can bifurcate into a sink and the economy may experience periods of financial instability and banking crises. Although crises are random events, the economy's exposure to financial instabilities depends on fundamental conditions. Thus, the predictive power of fundamentals does not contradict the random theory of crises.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.