Skip Navigation


Oxford Economic Papers Advance Access originally published online on February 9, 2005
Oxford Economic Papers 2005 57(3):479-496; doi:10.1093/oep/gpi015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/3/479    most recent
gpi015v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bender, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Heywood, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow C25 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models
Right arrow J16 - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
Right arrow J28 - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
Right arrow J71 - Discrimination
Right arrow M54 - Labor Management
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2005; All rights reserved

Job satisfaction and gender segregation

Keith A. Bender*, Susan M. Donohue{dagger}, and John S. Heywood{ddagger}

*Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Centre for European Labour Market Research, University of Aberdeen, UK {dagger}Graduate Program in Human Resources and Labor Relations, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee {ddagger}Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA, and Department of Commerce, University of Birmingham; e-mail: heywood{at}uwm.edu

Using data from the US, the determinants of overall job satisfaction are estimated as part of explaining ‘the paradox of the contented female worker’. Confirming earlier studies women report higher job satisfaction than men and higher job satisfaction in workplaces dominated by women workers. The US data allow us to demonstrate that men and women value job flexibility differently and that once differences in the extent of job flexibility are accounted for, the gender composition of the workplace plays no role in determining the job satisfaction of women. Thus, women in female dominated workplaces may report higher job satisfaction because they value job flexibility and so choose to dominate the workplaces that provide job flexibility.

Key Words: JEL classification: J28 • C25


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 OXF ECON PAPHome page
D. Gorlich and A. de Grip
Human capital depreciation during hometime
Oxf. Econ. Pap., April 1, 2009; 61(suppl_1): i98 - i121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 OXF ECON PAPHome page
J. S. Heywood, W. S. Siebert, and X. Wei
The implicit wage costs of family friendly work practices
Oxf. Econ. Pap., April 1, 2007; 59(2): 275 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.