Skip Navigation

Oxford Economic Papers 2006 58(3):407-449; doi:10.1093/oep/gpl004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sloane, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow I10 - General
Right arrow J14 - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped
Right arrow J16 - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
Right arrow J18 - Public Policy
Right arrow J20 - General
Right arrow J30 - General
Right arrow J31 - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
Right arrow K31 - Labor Law
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2006

Disability, gender, and the British labour market

Melanie K. Jones*, Paul L. Latreille*, and Peter J. Sloane{dagger},

*WELMERC, Department of Economics, University of Wales Swansea
{dagger}Department of Economics, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP

Correspondence: e-mail: p.j.sloane{at}swansea.ac.uk

Using UK LFS data, we examine the impact of disability on labour market outcomes by gender since the Disability Discrimination Act. Substantial differences in employment incidence and earnings continue to exist, especially for those with mental health problems. Distinguishing between work-limiting and non-work-limiting disability, the unobserved productivity effect of disability can be separated from discrimination. Limited evidence of wage discrimination against the disabled exists, but the ‘penalty’ for work-limiting disability, while falling for men, has increased for women. The improvement for disabled males is largely ‘unexplained’, possibly reflecting the impact of the legislation; this is not the case for females.

Key Words: JEL classification: I1 • J2 • J3


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.