Skip Navigation


Oxford Economic Papers Advance Access originally published online on July 23, 2007
Oxford Economic Papers 2008 60(2):254-274; doi:10.1093/oep/gpm021
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/2/254    most recent
gpm021v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Røed, K.
Right arrow Articles by Thoursie, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2007 All rights reserved

Unemployment duration and unemployment insurance: a comparative analysis based on Scandinavian micro data

Knut Røed*, Peter Jensen{dagger}, and Anna Thoursie{ddagger}

*The Ragnar Frisch Centre for Economic Research, Oslo, Norway; e-mail: knut.roed{at}frisch.uio.no
{dagger}Department of Economics, the Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus, Denmark; e-mail: pje{at}asb.dk
{ddagger}Agora, Arenagruppen, Stockholm, Sweden; e-mail: anna.thoursie{at}arenagruppen.se

JEL classifications: C41, J64


  Abstract

Based on pooled register data from Norway and Sweden, we find that differences in unemployment duration patterns reflect dissimilarities in unemployment insurance (UI) systems in a way that convincingly establishes the link between economic incentives and job search behaviour. Specifically, UI benefits are relatively more generous for low-income workers in Sweden than in Norway, leading to relatively longer unemployment spells for low-income workers in Sweden. Based on the between-countries variation in replacement ratios, we find that the elasticity of the outflow rate from insured unemployment with respect to the replacement ratio is approximately one in Norway and 0.5 in Sweden.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.