Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McPeak, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
Right arrow O13 - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Other Primary Products
Right arrow Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
Right arrow Q14 - Agricultural Finance
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Oxford Economic Papers 56 (2004), 263-284
© Oxford University Press 2004; All rights reserved

Contrasting income shocks with asset shocks: livestock sales in northern Kenya

John McPeak

Departments of Public Administration and Economics, Maxwell School, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244–1020, USA; e-mail: jomcpeak{at}maxwell.syr.edu

The literature on risk management in agrarian economies has predominantly focused on the use of assets to buffer consumption against income shocks. However, households in certain low-income, high-risk environments confront asset as well as income shocks. This study investigates livestock sales behavior in an environment where both income and asset shocks occur. The nature of each type of shock is analyzed, and their respective impact on sales behavior is identified. Results indicate income and asset shocks are positively correlated, but influence sales in an offsetting fashion. This provides a possible explanation for the limited empirical support found by previous studies investigating the role of livestock sales in buffering consumption. Marketing and savings institutions that reduce vulnerability to asset shocks in addition to income shocks offer the potential to reduce household risk exposure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.