Skip Navigation


Oxford Economic Papers Advance Access originally published online on April 26, 2007
Oxford Economic Papers 2007 59(3):486-512; doi:10.1093/oep/gpm004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/3/486    most recent
gpm004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D30 - General
Right arrow D45 - Rationing; Licensing
Right arrow D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
Right arrow H31 - Household
Right arrow H42 - Publicly Provided Private Goods
Right arrow I18 - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2007 All rights reserved

Paying vs. waiting in the pursuit of specific egalitarianism

Jeremy Clark* and Bonggeun Kim{dagger}

*Department of Economics, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand, 8020; e-mail: jeremy.clark{at}canterbury.ac.nz
{dagger}Department of Economics and Finance, Hanyang University and Department of Economics, University of Waikato


   Abstract

We propose an allocation mechanism for publicly providing a private good such that the final allocation is independent of income yet increasing in strength of preference or need. The ‘pay or wait’ mechanism consists of offering the good for sale at two outlets. The ‘queuing’ outlet charges a low money price, but high waiting time per unit. The ‘pricing’ outlet charges a relatively high money price with rapid service. High wage individuals will opt for the pricing outlet, and low wage individuals the queuing outlet. If the policy maker stocks the outlets in proportion to the distribution of wage earners in the population, consumers of both wages will purchase the same amount on average, while those who value the good more relative to other goods will receive more of it. These outcomes are at risk if the good can be resold, but may be preserved if the policy maker can create transactions costs associated with resale.

Key Words: JEL classifications: D30 • D45 • H31 • I18


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.