Skip Navigation


Oxford Economic Papers Advance Access originally published online on July 30, 2007
Oxford Economic Papers 2007 59(4):561-582; doi:10.1093/oep/gpm026
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/4/561    most recent
gpm026v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bougheas, S.
Right arrow Articles by Morrissey, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D64 - Altruism
Right arrow F34 - International Lending and Debt Problems
Right arrow F35 - Foreign Aid
Right arrow I38 - Government Policy; Provision and Effects of [...]
Right arrow O20 - General
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2007 All rights reserved

Tough love or unconditional charity?

Spiros Bougheas*, Indraneel Dasgupta{dagger}, and Oliver Morrissey*

*University of Nottingham
{dagger}School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD; e-mail: indraneel.dasgupta{at}nottingham.ac.uk


  Abstract

Charitable giving increasingly requires recipients to undertake costly prior action. A common justification is that willingness to undertake costly actions signals greater productivity from transfers. We demonstrate that, if the distribution of recipient types is unknown, recipient costs indivisible and productivity unobservable, conditional charity, once instituted, may not yield information adequate to refute its efficiency claim. Consequently, donors who inefficiently provide conditional charity will not correct themselves. Donors who wrongly provide unconditional charity may however subsequently correct themselves. This offers grounds for scepticism regarding efficiency claims for conditional charity. We also provide reasons for encouraging donor competition and indicator targeting.

Key Words: JEL classifications: F35 • F34 • I38 • O20


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.