Skip Navigation


Oxford Economic Papers Advance Access originally published online on May 15, 2007
Oxford Economic Papers 2007 59(4):641-661; doi:10.1093/oep/gpm003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/4/641    most recent
gpm003v2
gpm003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choudhary, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Orszag, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow C61 - Optimization Techniques; Programming [...]
Right arrow D40 - General
Right arrow D42 - Monopoly
Right arrow E32 - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
Right arrow L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; [...]
Right arrow L12 - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
Right arrow M31 - Marketing
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2007 All rights reserved

Costly customer relations and pricing

M. Ali Choudhary* and J. Michael Orszag{dagger}

*Department of Economics, University of Surrey, Surrey GU2 7XH; e-mail: a.choudhary{at}surrey.ac.uk
{dagger}Watson Wyatt LLP


  Abstract

In this paper we show that when a monopolist incurs certain costs for servicing or maintaining its customer-base, price markups may decrease with high demand — i.e. markups are countercylical. Indeed, for a given market share when demand booms each customer on average will purchase more output and the costs of servicing clients are spread across a larger volume of output sold. This increasing-return effect raises the incentive for the monopolists to expand its market-share by reducing markups. We also find evidence on UK data that industries with higher customer-care costs tend to have a higher degree of coutercyclical markups as compared with industries with lower such costs.

Key Words: JEL classifications: D4 • E32 • C61

Please note equation numbers have been altered on page 7


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.