Skip Navigation

Enforcement-proof contracts with moral hazard in precaution: ensuring ‘permanence’ in carbon sequestration

  1. Charles Palmer
  1. *Center of Economic Research, ETH Zürich
  2. †Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zürich
  3. ‡Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE; e-mail: c.palmer1{at}lse.ac.uk

Abstract

Opportunistic behaviour due to imperfect contract enforcement is a risk in many economic transactions. In this paper, an enforcement-proof incentive contract is developed in which a buyer demands a guaranteed delivery of a good or service given a productive upfront payment, moral hazard in precaution, and the potential for opportunistic contract breach. Investing in a contract upfront is found to be restricted by moral hazard and opportunistic contract breach. This limits the size of investment up to a specific level even if an infinite scale-up of production were beneficial. A more severe moral hazard problem results in a smaller distortion. The framework is applied and extended to international carbon sequestration contracts. In comparison to alternative liability attributions, the current regime of buyer liability yields inefficiently low levels of investment in carbon sequestration.

JEL classifications

JEL codes

| Table of Contents

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.